Bug#1023149: marked as done (pandoc FTBFS on i386)
- To: John MacFarlane <jgm@berkeley.edu>
- Cc: 1023149@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#1023149: marked as done (pandoc FTBFS on i386)
- From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 13:39:54 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] Y4nkCgSqNBwQAbYZ@localhost>
- Reply-to: Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>, 1023149@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <50A13A86-2EE7-4D3F-A183-C6930768DF83@berkeley.edu>
- References: <E1oy7jH-00CfhT-7R@fasolo.debian.org> <166715380741.4482.15603060441419779632.reportbug@localhost> <handler.1023149.D1023149.16692790302869862.ackdone@bugs.debian.org> <50A13A86-2EE7-4D3F-A183-C6930768DF83@berkeley.edu> <166715380741.4482.15603060441419779632.reportbug@localhost>
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 10:31:01AM -0700, John MacFarlane wrote:
> Just an observation: adding the -O0 option here will create an unoptimized build, which will run more slowly. So this is definitely not a patch that should remain more than short-term.
>...
That's clear, but it is only on i386 (the old 32bit architecture).
While I agree that this is not an appropriate long-term fix,
slow pandoc on i386 should not be a problem for many users.
cu
Adrian
Reply to: