Bug#1003964: pandoc doesn't start: error while loading shared libraries: libcmark-gfm.so.0.29.0.gfm.0
Package: pandoc
Version: 2.9.2.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
While looking at some test issues in libpod-pandoc-perl, I noticed
that pandoc looks quite broken in current amd64/sid:
% pandoc --version
pandoc: error while loading shared libraries: libcmark-gfm.so.0.29.0.gfm.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
% echo $?
127
% apt-file search libcmark-gfm.so.0.29.0.gfm.0
libcmark-gfm0: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcmark-gfm.so.0.29.0.gfm.0
% dpkg -l libcmark-gfm0
…
ii libcmark-gfm0:amd64 0.29.0.gfm.2-1 amd64 CommonMark GitHub flavor gfm library
% dpkg -L libcmark-gfm0
/.
/usr
/usr/lib
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcmark-gfm.so.0.29.0.gfm.2
/usr/share
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/libcmark-gfm0
/usr/share/doc/libcmark-gfm0/changelog.Debian.gz
/usr/share/doc/libcmark-gfm0/changelog.gz
/usr/share/doc/libcmark-gfm0/copyright
/usr/share/lintian
/usr/share/lintian/overrides
/usr/share/lintian/overrides/libcmark-gfm0
% ls -la /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcmark-gfm.so.0.29.0.gfm.2 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcmark-gfm.so.0.29.0.gfm.0
ls: cannot access '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcmark-gfm.so.0.29.0.gfm.0': No such file or directory
- -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 317688 Jan 18 01:43 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcmark-gfm.so.0.29.0.gfm.2
So it looks like pandoc wants libcmark-gfm.so.0.29.0.gfm.0 but libcmark-gfm0
ships libcmark-gfm.so.0.29.0.gfm.2. Maybe this is an issue in libcmark-gfm0
… Not sure where to fix this.
cmark-gfm (0.29.0.gfm.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream version.
* Fix for CVE-2020-5238. (Closes: #965984)
* Switch man page --safe to --unsafe. (Closes: #1003745)
-- Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com> Mon, 17 Jan 2022 16:43:27 -0800
cmark-gfm (0.29.0.gfm.0-6) unstable; urgency=medium
* Use <stdbool.h> directly instead of "config.h". (Closes: #969212)
-- Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com> Wed, 02 Sep 2020 10:25:33 -0700
Cheers,
gregor
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'oldoldstable'), (500, 'experimental'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-8-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_AT.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages pandoc depends on:
ii libc6 2.33-2
ii libcmark-gfm-extensions0 0.29.0.gfm.2-1
ii libcmark-gfm0 0.29.0.gfm.2-1
ii libffi8 3.4.2-4
ii libgmp10 2:6.2.1+dfsg-3
ii libpcre3 2:8.39-13
ii pandoc-data 2.9.2.1-2
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.11.dfsg-2
pandoc recommends no packages.
Versions of packages pandoc suggests:
pn citation-style-language-styles <none>
ii context 2020.03.10.20200331-1
pn ghc <none>
ii groff 1.22.4-8
pn libjs-katex <none>
ii libjs-mathjax 2.7.9+dfsg-1
ii librsvg2-bin 2.50.7+dfsg-2
pn nodejs <none>
pn pandoc-citeproc <none>
ii perl 5.32.1-6
pn php <none>
pn python <none>
pn r-base-core <none>
ii ruby 1:2.7.6
ii texlive-latex-extra 2021.20211217-1
ii texlive-latex-recommended 2021.20211217-1
ii texlive-luatex 2021.20211217-1
ii texlive-xetex 2021.20211217-1
pn wkhtmltopdf <none>
- -- no debconf information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=2b+J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: