[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: LTS 11?



Hi,

Am Montag, den 02.04.2018, 03:07 +0000 schrieb Clint Adams:
> On Sun, Apr 01, 2018 at 09:52:52PM -0400, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > I know that given that _could_ just do it myself, so it is a bit
> > hypocritical to send this mail to the list, but … well, you know how it
> > is. Anyways, is anyone here on the team going to tackle getting 8.2.2
> > and LTS-11 into unstable soon? We are now so far behind that one cannot
> > build GHC HEAD on unstable any more...
> 
> We've been waiting for #886222 to get fixed, though I suspect uploading
> GHC 8.2 would make it more likely for that to happen.

hmm, would it be too bad to remove Haskell on mips from testing during
the transition? This way the transition can happen in parallel to the
linker fix being implemented, and mips can catch up once they are
ready.

Or maybe the non-gold linker can be used on mips?

Cheers,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim “nomeata” Breitner • nomeata@debian.org • https://j.oach.im/
  

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: