Hi, Am Samstag, den 30.04.2016, 09:44 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner: > Am Mittwoch, den 27.04.2016, 09:20 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner: > > > > I am wondering if lambdabot is really in a shape suitable for > > distribution. It drags in lots of badly maintained libraries, and > > repeatedly is a cause of annoyance. > > does anyone care about this? upstream writes: “As for the discussion here, sorry, but I tend to do only maintenance when a new ghc release turns up.” https://github.com/lambdabot/lambdabot/issues/139#issuecomment-219519010 This confirms my worries that lambdabot is likely to continue to cause worries. Are there other opinions on this? Greetings, Joachim -- -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org • https://people.debian.org/~nomeata XMPP: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de • GPG-Key: 0xF0FBF51F https://www.joachim-breitner.de/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part