Hi,
Am Samstag, den 30.04.2016, 09:44 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> Am Mittwoch, den 27.04.2016, 09:20 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> >
> > I am wondering if lambdabot is really in a shape suitable for
> > distribution. It drags in lots of badly maintained libraries, and
> > repeatedly is a cause of annoyance.
>
> does anyone care about this?
upstream writes:
“As for the discussion here, sorry, but I tend to do only
maintenance when a new ghc release turns up.”
https://github.com/lambdabot/lambdabot/issues/139#issuecomment-219519010
This confirms my worries that lambdabot is likely to continue to cause
worries.
Are there other opinions on this?
Greetings,
Joachim
--
--
Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
Debian Developer
nomeata@debian.org • https://people.debian.org/~nomeata
XMPP: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de • GPG-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
https://www.joachim-breitner.de/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part