[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: binNMUs



Hi,

Am Mittwoch, den 16.03.2016, 15:55 +0000 schrieb Clint Adams:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:44:55AM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > >  * haskell-http-conduit (on at least armel)
> > >  * haskell-binary-tagged (on at least hppa, sparc64)
> > >  * haskell-aeson (on at least mips64el)
> > 
> > just returning from vacation, and catching up. I scheduled everything
> > that the script told me to do. Are the ones below still relevant? Why
> > does the script not pick them up?
> 
> I assume you don't have access to binNMU the architectures in ports.

I can schedule binNMUs, but my script does not (and cannot) generate
them, because ports are not fist class citizens, so I don’t bother
about them. But I’ll paste corret binNMU lines if someone mails them to
me.

> As for armel, it looks like a binNMU won't fix our
> incorrect Build-Depends.

So http-conduit needs a sourceful upload, right?

Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
-- 
Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata@debian.org • https://people.debian.org/~nomeata
  XMPP: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de • GPG-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
  https://www.joachim-breitner.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: