Hi, Am Samstag, den 26.12.2015, 13:08 +0000 schrieb Dmitry Bogatov: > * in many cases it provides almost identical binary packages > > Almost? > > Yes. Unfortunately, dh_buildinfo will generate different > `buildinfo_all.gz', so we will have different `md5sums' file > and Installed-Size: field. Identical up to buildinfo_all.gz is perfect! Good job! I’m looking forward to this. > If it would be possible. Many packages have overrides, that need to be > ported. Most of them are trivial, but still not trivial enough to be handled > automatically. So I propose to upload dh-haskell into sid and migrate > one-by-one. I agree that dh-haskell can be uploaded to sid, so that everyone can easily play around with it? I’m not sure I buy the benefits one-by-one migration. Why not do all at once? Using "dht make-all", we can easily test building everything without having it uploaded to sid. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part