Hi Colin, Am Dienstag, den 22.12.2015, 02:52 +0000 schrieb Colin Watson: > Now that we have build profiles, I've implemented and tested stage1 > build profile support for all of happy, alex, and uuagc, and uploaded > all those to unstable since the current ghc transition is out of the > way. This should help out porters a little bit without > inconveniencing normal development. Thanks for that. There is more demand for build profiles, and an actual use case now: Am Dienstag, den 22.12.2015, 10:24 +0100 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: > Test build on armhf went without problems. Now building the actual > package for armel. After that, we will need to build and upload > hscolour manually on armel since there is still a circular build > dependency (might be an idea to resolve it with the help of > build profiles, for example). Do you think this can also be fixed using build profiles? And are build profiles actually already supported by our auto-building infrastructure? If not, what is the practical gain today? Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part