Hi, Am Montag, den 24.08.2015, 13:55 +0200 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: > On 24/08/15 13:37, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > from my understanding, the current Haskell packages in unstable > > should > > be able to migrate to testing. At least my binNMU tool¹ does not > > indicate any errors on release architectures, and the release tracker² > > only shows what I believe are false negatives. > > > > Nevertheless, none of the hints created by the autohinter is accepted > > by britney: > > https://release.debian.org/britney/update_output.txt > > > > Are there some problems left that I am not aware of? Or is the auto > > -hinter incomplete in this case? It does take removals into account > > these days, does it? > > There needs to be a remove hint for it to take removals into account. Do any > packages need to be removed from testing? If so let us know which ones and we > can add a hint for them. is that true even for packages that have been removed in unstable? From the top of my head, there is haskell-src-exts on mips and mipsel, together with reverse dependencies (haskel-hoogle, hlint, hothasktags). Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part