Re: darcs.debian.org broken?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Am 2015-07-19 um 09:48 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> Hi,
>
> Am Samstag, den 18.07.2015, 22:08 +0200 schrieb Alexander Wirt:
>> On Sat, 18 Jul 2015, James McCoy wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 08:24:51PM +0200, Simon Kainz wrote:
>>>> DUCK [1] just informed me, that there are ~750 issues with
>>>> VCS -Darcs URLS [2], mosty 404. This seems to be the fact
>>>> since now 3 days. Please take care of that.
>>>
>>> This is due to the Darcs repositories being decommissioned[0]
>>> and moved to git.
Ok, good to know - I already stated debugging my URL checking scripts...
>>>
>>> [0]:
>>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-haskell/2015/07/msg00060.html
>> Yeah, knowing this in advance would helped me not to do a debug
>> session on alioth..
>>
>
>
> sorry.
>
> Maybe the idea of having some data that is only useful if
> up-to-date (where the VCS is) inside something that we want to be
> static (package metadata) is bad design...
Hmm, the data itself might as well be up-to-date and continually
changing, as long as the URL pointing to it is (somwhat) stable,
everything should be OK. Or am I getting this wrong?
>
> Anyways, we expect to do sourceful uploads of all Haskell packages
> when we land GHC-7.10 in Debian, sometime the coming weeks. By that
> time, we will update the VCS fields.
Great, thank you.
>
> Speaking of which: Do you have any good suggestion about what the
> VCS -Git field should actually say, given that we have one git
> repository with packages in subdirectories?
>
> Greetings, Joachim
>
Simon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=wbxc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: