[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Packages to drop?



Hi,

in the current package plan, these packages are marked as obsolete,
likely because they specify upper bounds on packages that we have
upgraded.

If you care about any of these, please have a look, otherwise I’ll ask
for their removal from Debian soon:

binary-communicator 1.0.2.1 obsolete
BlogLiterately 0.7.1.7 obsolete # wants old hscolour
bluetile 0.6 binary obsolete
data-pprint 0.2.3 obsolete
editline 0.2.1.1 obsolete
fastcgi 3001.0.2.4 obsolete
glade 0.12.5.0 obsolete
gloss 1.9.3.1 obsolete # needs to be patched to allow older base
gstreamer 0.12.1.2 obsolete
gtkglext 0.12.1 obsolete
hamlet 1.2.0 obsolete
happstack-hsp 7.3.2 obsolete # requires newer src-exts
hoauth 0.3.5 obsolete
hsx 0.10.4 obsolete # reqiures old src-exts
hsx2hs 0.13.2 obsolete # reqiures old src-exts
hsx-jmacro 7.3.5 obsolete # requires old src-exts
http-attoparsec 0.1.1 obsolete
libtagc 0.12.0 obsolete
MonadCatchIO-mtl 0.3.1.0 obsolete
pastis 0.1.2 obsolete # no support for network-2.6, seems to be dead upstream
process-conduit 1.1.0.0 obsolete
rss2irc 1.0.6 binary obsolete
shakespeare-css 1.1.0 obsolete
shakespeare-i18n 1.1.0 obsolete
shakespeare-js 1.3.0 obsolete
shakespeare-text 1.1.0 obsolete
tokyocabinet-haskell 0.0.5 obsolete
type-level 0.2.4 obsolete
weighted-regexp 0.3.1.2 obsolete
yesod-markdown 0.9.2 obsolete # no yesod-1.4 version yet

Some of these might have new, working versions since I last checked. In
that case, simply update the package plan.

If you patch any of these, make sure upstream receives the patch. Also
suggest that upstream should join stackage
(http://www.stackage.org/authors) so that others can deal with this
problem the next time.

Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F
  JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: