Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 26.08.2015, 08:42 +0100 schrieb Edmund Grimley Evans: > Most of the results are in: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=haskell > -cryptonite&suite=experimental > > It's failing in a consistent way on the big-endian architectures: > powerpc, s390x, ppc64, and we'll probably see the same on mips in due > course. If anyone wants to look at the problem, it's easy to find the > relevant part of the code (look at the test names in the log), and > there's not a lot of it. Presumably there's a place in there where > little-endian is assumed. thanks for the analysis. Surely upstream will also know what happens with that patch? I forwarded your summary to https://github.com/vincenthz/cryptonite/issues/26#issuecomment-134887913 Are you going to refine your patch? > There are different failures on armhf and kfreebsd-amd64. The > failures > are somewhat similar, even though the architectures have little in > common, and 0.6-1 was built successfully on kfreebsd-amd64. Also the > error message says "Use ... to reproduce", suggesting that the test > was random. So it looks like a genuine, architecture-independent bug > that is only sometimes, randomly exposed by the test suite. To test > that theory I'm going to ask for a give-back on those two > architectures. I can do the give-backs, and just have done so. I also opened https://github.com/vincenthz/cryptonite/issues/29 about this Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part