Hi, Am Sonntag, den 12.07.2015, 16:10 +0200 schrieb Sven Bartscher: > > > recently, I brought up the idea of removing a bunch of cruft that is > > > neither a dependency of something that we want for sure (a “key” > > > package) nor in Stackage (presumably easy to maintain). > > > > > > With the current transition (almost) done, maybe that should be the > > > next thing to tackle. I expect that doing that now will make the 7.10 > > > transition quicker, as there are simply fewer not-well-maintained > > > packages that can break. > > > > Shouldn’t we wait until there is a Stackage LTS with GHC 7.10, before > > we switch to GHC 7.10? I guess if we switch before Stackage, we will > > get a lot of packages ahead. > > > > Since, we don’t know when Stackage will upgrade (or does someone?), > > I guess it would be good to use the time until then to clean up. > > that’s precisely what I had in mind. But note that Stackage (non-LTS) is already on 7.10, and LTS-3 will simply be a snapshot of that, so we could simply upgrade to some stackage nightly while putting 7.10 to unstable, and then follow the nightlies until LTS-3.0 is out. But let’s do the removals first, then. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part