[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: yi

Hi Gianfranco,

Am Fri, 29 May 2015 09:06:58 +0100 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna:

>I guess LGPL is not a license, but a *set* of licenses.
>Maybe you mean something like LGPL-2.1+ or whatever is appropriate
>there (look for the "later" word, licensecheck might help too)

Thanks, that brought me to the point: I was referencing LGPL-2.1 under
common-licenses, but stated LGPL without version as the license. Lintian
got rightfully confused by that. ;-)


Attachment: pgpYNMkrgtwVt.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to: