> Am 08.05.2015 um 05:38 schrieb David Fox <dsf@seereason.com>:
> > David, are you still planning on doing this, or should I jump in?
>
> On closer examination, it looks like hsx really is obsolete. There are libraries with hsx in their name, but they no longer care about hsx itself.
Indeed. I just checked my dependence chain and discovered, that it
only contains hsp and hsx2hs. Are you still gonna take care of hsx2hs?
I also discovered that I need happstack-hsp, which is on the list to remove,
so I will have to look at that, if no one else does.