Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 30.04.2015, 16:52 +0000 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna: > Since we are in the early Stretch release, I propose to change > - llvm-3.4 [armel armhf], > + llvm-3.4 [arm64 armel armhf],into llvm-3.5, since it is the default on unstable/testing right now > > > > (or maybe even llvm-3.6, I guess it will be uploaded shortly on unstable). > > I got many build failures on arm due to this incongruence (and a bad cmake file) > > e.g. https://github.com/hedgewars/hw/commit/9172884139fe533dddf4be7f1e67934bebf24e5e > > "You are using a new version of LLVM that hasn't been tested yet! > > We will try though" > > (don't know if something like llvm-dev is too dangerous) we should fix the LLVM release according to what version GHC works with. According to http://smart-cactus.org/~ben/posts/2014-11-28-state-of-llvm-backend.html we need llvm-3.4 for ghc-7.8, so the above is right. If you still get the warning, then our patches try to use the right runtime did not work as intended. I guess they are only applied on arm, and on other architectures, you’ll have to tell GHC explicitly to use the right LLVM binaries. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part