Re: Priority of buildd-unstable?
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 05:50:42PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> with buildd-unstable available, I can schedule Haskell binNMUs much
> faster, which is good. But I'm starting to worry that the builds would
> still use packages from unstable, even though there is a newer (but not
> yet installable) version in buildd-unstable. It's hard to check
> directly, because of the volatile nature of these repos... so here is my
> question:
>
> If a package pkg is available in both unstable and buildd-unstable, will
> the builders consider installing the former?
apt will so both Packages files, so apt will do whatever apt
normally does, and I think that's installing the latest version.
Why would you want to use the older version?
Kurt
Reply to: