Hi, Am Freitag, den 03.10.2014, 19:57 +0200 schrieb Sven Bartscher: > A while ago the cabal library was packaged separately from GHC, but > since I didn't follow the discussion very closely, I don't know the > details of the process. > > As it's now, we have two version of the cabal library in the > repository. (The libghc-cabal-dev one and the GHC one). > > Most of the time it's not that much of a problem, but sometimes it > gets really annoying (i.e. incompatibilities between cabal-install and > Setup.hs that imports functions compiled against the GHC version...) . > > Is cabal going to be removed from GHC, or are there any big problems > coming with that? we haven’t fully explored all possibilities and problems yet. I suggest to use cabal as shipped by GHC as long as possible, and only depend on libghc-cabal-dev if explicitly required as a dependency (cabal-install being the prime motivation). Why exactly is your proposed changes to hgettext required? Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part