Hi, Am Freitag, den 27.06.2014, 21:21 +0200 schrieb Sven Bartscher: > On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 12:11:32 -0700 > Joachim Breitner <nomeata@debian.org> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Am Freitag, den 27.06.2014, 21:07 +0200 schrieb Sven Bartscher: > > > ghc-mod is currently marked as BD-Uninstallable on armel, armhf, mips, > > > mipsel and s390x. The missing dependency is ghc-ghci. > > > > > > I don't quite understand that. ghc-ghci is provided by ghc, which is > > > successfully built on all architectures. > > > > > > Can anyone explain to me, why the buildds pretend that ghc-ghci is > > > missing? > > > > The virtual package ghc-ghci is only provided by architectures that > > support the interpreter. If you would do "apt-cache show ghc" on s390x, > > it will _not_ Provide ghc-ghci. > > Thanks. I will do another upload with the right architectures specified. No! That is the point. We do _not_ specify architectures (but dependencies), and the buildd setup will automatically build the package on those architectures where it is supported. Does that make sense? Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part