[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: haskell-feed vs. rss2irc



Hi,

I could build it on Debian unstable with the current present packages. 

Thanks for reacting so quickly!
Joachim

Am Sonntag, den 13.04.2014, 09:55 -0700 schrieb Simon Michael:
> Thanks. These dependencies have become quite tricky. Could you double-check the latest at http://hub.darcs.net/simon/rss2irc works for you, then I'll release it. 
> 
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2014, at 07:30 AM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Am Samstag, den 12.04.2014, 07:19 -0700 schrieb Simon Michael:
> > > On Sat, Apr 12, 2014, at 01:47 AM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > > > you uploaded a new version of haskell-feed, without checking the effects
> > > > via all-packages (as far as I can see). The currently packaged version
> > > > of rss2irc depends on feed>=0.3.8 && <0.3.9.2, i.e. is explicitly
> > > > incompatible with feed-0.3.9.2.
> > > > 
> > > > Hi Simon,
> > > > 
> > > > are there any plans to support the latest version of feed soon?
> > > 
> > > I'll take a look at it. Which version of Debian are we talking about ?
> > > I'm wondering what is the latest version of http-conduit & resourcet
> > > it should depend on.
> > 
> > we are talking about Debian unstabke, which currently has
> > http-conduit-2.0.0.7 and resourcet-0.4.7.1. Upgrading these is of course
> > an option, if all depending packages can be upgraded to work with newer
> > versions.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Joachim
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
> > Debian Developer
> >   nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
> >   JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
> > Email had 1 attachment:
> > + signature.asc
> >   1k (application/pgp-signature)
> 
> 

-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: