On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 08:50:33PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Hi, > > with jessie frozen, and unstable meant to be the gateway to jessie, we > are basically frozen in unstable as well. > > But if we don’t want to completely fall dormant, we should continue > working in experimental. This also forces us to package for 7.8, which > is presumably a good thing :-) +1. > The only thing that I’m worried about: What is the best way to ensure > that all packages uploaded to experimental are indeed built with the ghc > in experimental? > > One brute-force-method would be to simply build-depend on "ghc (>= 7.8)" > in each and every package. But is there something smarter? I don't know of any other (this doesn't say much), but if this is what we can do now, why not? regards, iustin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature