[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Hoogle packaging - a few questions


Am Sonntag, den 21.09.2014, 21:23 +0200 schrieb Iustin Pop:
> I think the new update-hoogle script keeps the functionality of the old
> correctly (local packages + the keyword definitions) but fixing the
> 'internet download' issue , so the RC bug should be taken care of.

Great, thanks.

>  But I
> don't think the CGI functionality works anymore - at least the
> apache.conf configuration needs to be updated, there are some CGI
> patches that are not in the 'series' file, etc. So there's still work
> left to do on this package, but that'll have to wait another week on my
> side.

TBH, I couldn’t care less about that. It seems to be a huge integration
effort for a dubious use case. Using hoogle from the command line and
possibly editors/IDEs should be sufficient. I don’t mind it being


Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F
  JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: