Hi, Am Freitag, den 27.06.2014, 21:07 +0200 schrieb Sven Bartscher: > ghc-mod is currently marked as BD-Uninstallable on armel, armhf, mips, > mipsel and s390x. The missing dependency is ghc-ghci. > > I don't quite understand that. ghc-ghci is provided by ghc, which is > successfully built on all architectures. > > Can anyone explain to me, why the buildds pretend that ghc-ghci is > missing? The virtual package ghc-ghci is only provided by architectures that support the interpreter. If you would do "apt-cache show ghc" on s390x, it will _not_ Provide ghc-ghci. This way we conveniently prevent packages using Template Haskell and similar stuff from being attempted on architectures where that is not supported. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part