[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: lamdabot



On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 05:16:25PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> it seems that the lambdabot dependencies have passed NEW. A while ago I
> asked for volunteers to review lambdabot functionality, and whether it
> works in the stand-alone tool. Did someone start on that? Is someone
> interested in doing it?
> 
> Thanks,
> Joachim

Since today I've some free time available. Furthermore, when I joined the
team I acknowledged to take a look into this task. I'll gladly do the
revision of lambdabot functionality.

Thanks for reviving this issue. :-)

Cheers.
--
rul

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: