Hi, Am Montag, den 27.05.2013, 14:39 +0100 schrieb Colin Watson: > I can indeed confirm that we're starting to see failures due to broken > GHCi, for example: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=haskell-data-accessor-template&arch=armel&ver=0.2.1.10-3&stamp=1369656600 > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=haskell-distributive&arch=armhf&ver=0.3-2&stamp=1369561716 > > Note that some of the affected packages would succeed if GHCi were > disabled (because doctest detects that condition and skips), so it's not > quite true that we'd just have to remove all the affected packages > anyway. how bad is the breakage of GHCi on arm anyways? Just affecting some packages, or unusable? Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part