Hi, Am Samstag, den 11.05.2013, 11:25 +0300 schrieb Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho: > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 08:35:53PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > I think the Haskell Group can take it over. But some questions: Is the > > library really needed in Debian (i.e. are there other libraries or > > programs using it)? How active is BNFC maintained by upstream? How much > > maintenance work was required for bnfc (besides the pure packaging)? > > There are no dependencies in Debian. But I believe programs generated by BNFC > with certain options will require the library, so I would hesitate not > packaging the library. > > Upstream is active but (at least in the past) has been relatively slow, only > releasing every couple of years. They've now moved to a more open development > style; I don't know if that'll speed things up. From my perspective, bnfc has > been low maintenance. > > Upstream home page is at http://bnfc.digitalgrammars.com/ and Google group at > https://groups.google.com/group/bnfc-dev?hl=en Sounds good. > Thanks for considering taking it over from me :-) Will do. Do you have your packaging in a VCS whose history you’d like to retain? Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part