Re: [Pkg-haskell-maintainers] haskell-repa_3.2.3.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

To: debian-haskell@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [Pkg-haskell-maintainers] haskell-repa_3.2.3.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
From: Denis Laxalde <denis@laxalde.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 10:08:40 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 512F1E98.50901@laxalde.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1362005564.4434.1.camel@kirk>
References: <E1UAekB-0006sO-JC@franck.debian.org> <[🔎] 20130227201147.GA15228@laxalde.org> <[🔎] 1362005564.4434.1.camel@kirk>

Hi,

Joachim Breitner a écrit :

What is the proper procedure with respect with the Darcs repo in such
situations? Should I just fix things and push?


yes. We might have two tags with the same name then in the repo... but
doesn’t really hurt.


I've fixed the copyright and pushed.

Thanks,
Denis

Reply to:

References:
- Re: [Pkg-haskell-maintainers] haskell-repa_3.2.3.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
  - From: Denis Laxalde <denis@laxalde.org>
- Re: [Pkg-haskell-maintainers] haskell-repa_3.2.3.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
  - From: Joachim Breitner <nomeata@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [Pkg-haskell-maintainers] haskell-repa_3.2.3.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Previous by thread: Re: [Pkg-haskell-maintainers] haskell-repa_3.2.3.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread