[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Newer libraries needed for new Pandoc



Hi,

Am Montag, den 21.01.2013, 19:44 +0100 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> Quoting John MacFarlane (2013-01-21 18:12:19)
> > Thanks for these updates. It would be great to get 
> > libghc-highlighting-kate-dev, libghc-texmath-dev, and 
> > libghc-hs-bibutils-dev updated.  These fix bugs in pandoc's source 
> > code highlighting, math handling, and bibliography handling.

I’m missing the context: Should we update these package in experimental
now or not?
 
> > Jonas, I would suggest waiting a couple weeks before doing the pandoc 
> > package. After a release there are always some bugs to fix!
> 
> Ok. I just thought the very point of you releasing it was that it was 
> ripe for wider consumption/testing...

Any upload will go to experimental anyways, so I think findings the bugs
to fix there as well should be fine.

Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: