Hi, Am Dienstag, den 16.10.2012, 13:33 +1300 schrieb Michael Cree: > HC [stage 2] utils/haddock/dist/build/Haddock/GhcUtils.o > > utils/haddock/src/Haddock/GhcUtils.hs:1:35: > lexical error at character '\n' > make[2]: *** [utils/haddock/dist/build/Haddock/GhcUtils.o] Error 1 > > Full log is at: > http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ghc&arch=alpha&ver=7.6.1-2&stamp=1349784016 That is certainly strange. The file in question is just fine and builds ok on all other arches. The thing to note seems to be that this is the first file built by the stage 2 compiler. I assume this means that it is broken... You can report a bug at upstream: http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc but they tend to care not a whole lot about odd architectures. Nevertheless maybe someone has seen the error before and can easily tell what’s wrong. > I also see a lot of haskell packages coming through into the > experimental distribution and on Alpha some have been built with ghc > 7.4.1-4 from unstable. Would it be better if I did not upload the > built packages and left them sitting in the "built" state until we get > a working ghc in experimental so that they can built with ghc 7.6 and > I don't end up having to spend lots of time scheduling binNMUs? Sorry that was a mistake by me: For some of them my dependency adjusting regex failed, and they built against 7.4.1 by accident (and by aptitude’s preference of unstable over experimental). Yesterday I have hopefull re-uploaded all affected packages. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part