Re: WashNGo

To: debian-haskell@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: WashNGo
From: Clint Adams <clint@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 13:45:28 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20120310134528.GA18629@scru.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20120310183702.37c7fb30afc7e116fa8445b1@mega-nerd.com>
References: <[🔎] 20120310041913.GA6443@scru.org> <[🔎] 20120310183702.37c7fb30afc7e116fa8445b1@mega-nerd.com>

On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 06:37:02PM +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Isn't WashNGo pretty mush dead upstream? Last release was 2007:

It sure looked that way.

However, aside from build failures, we are now down to
these in the -doc transition:

libghc-agda-doc
libghc-darcs-doc
libghc-ghc-events-doc
libghc-haddock-doc
libghc-happstack-doc
libghc-happstack-ixset-doc
libghc-happstack-state-doc
libghc-leksah-server-doc
libghc-ltk-doc
libghc-haskelldb-hdbc-postgresql-doc
libghc-haskelldb-hdbc-sqlite3-doc
libghc-tokyocabinet-doc

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Remaining packages (Was: WashNGo)
  - From: Joachim Breitner <nomeata@debian.org>

References:
- WashNGo
  - From: Clint Adams <clint@debian.org>
- Re: WashNGo
  - From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+hs@mega-nerd.com>

Prev by Date: Re: WashNGo
Next by Date: Remaining packages (Was: WashNGo)
Previous by thread: Re: WashNGo
Next by thread: Remaining packages (Was: WashNGo)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread