Dear David, yes, this is correct. Previously, --interface-version was added by me to the Debian package, to expose the number in the first place: http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/ghc/7.0.4-8/haddock-expose-interface-version There, the result includes the prefix "haddock-interface-". Upstream adopted the patch, but dropped the prefix: http://trac.haskell.org/haddock/ticket/172 Greetings, Joachim Am Mittwoch, den 04.01.2012, 08:50 -0800 schrieb David Fox: > In ghc revision 4 the ghc-doc package now depends on > haddock-interface-18, but haddock --interface-version still prints > "18" whereas in earlier compilers it printed "haddock-interface-16". > > On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Joachim Breitner > <nomeata@debian.org> wrote: > Hi David, > > Am Samstag, den 31.12.2011, 10:31 -0800 schrieb David Fox: > > On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 10:27 AM, David Fox > <ddssff@gmail.com> wrote: > > When I try to install ghc-doc I get this message: > > > > > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > ghc-doc : Depends: 18 > > > > Oh, I see, 18 is provided by ghc-haddock. > > > correct, but thanks for the heads up, it should be > "haddock-interface-18", fixed in Darcs and will be better in > the next > upload. > > Greetings, > Joachim > > -- > Joachim "nomeata" Breitner > Debian Developer > nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C > JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | > http://people.debian.org/~nomeata > > -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part