Dear Michał,
Am Sonntag, den 02.12.2012, 22:44 +0100 schrieb "Michał J. Gajda":
On 12/02/2012 09:20 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
I noticed that Ubuntu, as well as Debian and original packages come
without some variants of threaded debugging binaries.
A recent change added of printing a stack trace with -xc option requires
using both -ticky and profiling compile options,
which in turn forces program to be compiled in a -debug RTS way.
Since stack trace looks like indispensable debugging tool, and
convenient parallelization is strength of Haskell,
I wonder is there any remaining reason to leave beginners with a cryptic
error message
when they try to debug a parallel or threaded application, and want to
take advantage of stack trace?
The resulting ghc-prof package would be increased by less than 1%.
Here is a patch for Ubuntu/Debian GHC 7.4.2 package, as well as upstream
--- ghc-7.4.2-orig/mk/config.mk.in 2012-06-06 19:10:25.000000000 +0200
+++ ghc-7.4.2/mk/config.mk.in 2012-12-01 00:22:29.055003842 +0100
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@
# l : event logging
# thr_l : threaded and event logging
#
-GhcRTSWays=l
+GhcRTSWays=l thr_debug_p thr_debug
# Usually want the debug version
ifeq "$(BootingFromHc)" "NO"
I notice that your patch modifies the defaults of GHC as shipped by
upstream, and I wonder if there is a reason why these ways are not
enabled by default.
Dear GHC HQ: Would you advice against or for providing a RTS in the
thr_debug_p and thr_debug ways in the Debian package?