Hi John, I’m wondering: Why did you add -threaded then? I’d expect the threaded RTS to actually be slower unless you make (good!) use of multiple threads... Greetings, Joachim Am Sonntag, den 01.07.2012, 11:11 -0700 schrieb John MacFarlane: > This failure is caused by the new default of -threaded in the pandoc > executable. It wouldn't hurt to remove '-threaded', as pandoc currently > isn't written in such a way that it would run faster on multiple cores. > Or '-threaded' could be removed selectively for sparc architecture. > (I think this can be done via a command-line option to cabal...) > > John > > ----- Forwarded message from Debian buildds <noreply@buildd.debian.org> ----- > > Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2012 15:30:04 +0000 > From: Debian buildds <noreply@buildd.debian.org> > To: pandoc@packages.qa.debian.org > Subject: failed sparc build of pandoc 1.9.4.2-1 > X-Virus-Status: No > > * Source package: pandoc > * Version: 1.9.4.2-1 > * Architecture: sparc > * State: failed > * Suite: sid > * Builder: lebrun.debian.org > * Build log: https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=pandoc&arch=sparc&ver=1.9.4.2-1&stamp=1341156275&file=log > > Please note that these notifications do not necessarily mean bug reports > in your package but could also be caused by other packages, temporary > uninstallabilities and arch-specific breakages. A look at the build log > despite this disclaimer would be appreciated however. > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part