[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: haskell transition: Remove, Transition, Upload Fix or Upload Fix, Wait, Transition?

Hi Mehdi,

Am Freitag, den 08.06.2012, 14:13 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
> On 08/06/12 14:01, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> >> If they are
> >> really fixed in sid, I think we can age them to let haskell stack migrate.
> >
> > Ok, if there is no rush before the freeze we can do that. I’ll see if
> > the package in experimental really fixes the problem and then upload to
> > unstable.
> >
> Please tell us when/if it is confirmed.

semi-good news only: My fix to the endianness problem in the AES code
worked, including on powerpc, but there is another failing test case on
powerpc that does _not_ seem to be tied to endiannes, as it does not
fail on s390/s390x:

I don’t have a fix for the powerpc issue. Unless some fix comes up it
seems we’d have to remove stuff on powerpc. Should I upload this version
to unstable neverthesse, to at least improve the situation on 390, s390x
and (likely, buildds did not build yet) mips and sparc.


Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: