Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 21.03.2012, 14:50 +0100 schrieb Iustin Pop: > Yes, this is exactly the kind of potential issues that make me dislike > the "entire world" backports choice. > > Just to understand better: why do you think a backport for (e.g.) > libghc6-hslogger-dev is confusing for users? It's a leaf package, so no > rebuild issues, etc. > > For me at least, that seems a trivial thing, whereas even only ghc (7.4) > backport is daunting. ok, leaf packages are less of an issue. I kinda dislike to single out packages instead of treating all of them consistently. But this is Debian: If you want to invest the work, you can decide how to do it. So you are welcome to proceed that way and I won’t hold it against you :-) Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part