Hi there,
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 03:16:23PM +0000, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 29.02.2012, 00:07 -0400 schrieb Joey Hess:
> > binary is now provided by ghc. Besides causing the file conflict
> > documented in #659081, having libghc-binary-dev still around causes some
> > other problems. For one, if a package is built against the binary in
> > ghc, and libghc-binary-dev is installed, ghc sees a conflict and hides
> > the package that depends on binary.
> >
> > Some libraries are currently being built against libghc-binary-dev,
> > and others against the one in ghc, and these libraries cannot be
> > used at the same time due to the conflict between the binaries.
>
> as discussed in
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-haskell/2012/02/msg00034.html
> the plan is to remove the haskell-binary source package from Debian, and
> always use the version in GHC. I just did not get around to file a
> removal bug yet.
If I got this right, there are 7 packages which declare versioned BDs on
libghc-binary-dev and will need to be fixed:
laney@raleigh> grep-dctrl -FBuild-Depends,Build-Depends-Indep -sPackage "libghc-binary-dev (" /var/lib/apt/lists/localhost:3142_debian_dists_unstable_main_source_Sources | sort | uniq
Package: agda
Package: haskell-binary-communicator
Package: haskell-binary-shared
Package: haskell-data-binary-ieee754
Package: haskell-hakyll
Package: haskell-midi
Package: haskell-snap-server
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ iain@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer [ laney@debian.org ]
Ubuntu Developer [ laney@ubuntu.com ]
PhD student [ ial@cs.nott.ac.uk ]
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature