Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 28.09.2011, 07:20 +0300 schrieb Michael Snoyman: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Clint Adams <clint@debian.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 05:34:17PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > >> Another approach would be to find out (e.g. ask upstream) if yesod makes > >> sense on a non-threaded runtime. If it turns out that it is hardly > >> useful, then it is better to remove yesod on sparce. > > > > Hi Michael, > > > > Could you comment? > > > > Without knowing the background here, I'd say Yesod is almost always > going to be using the multi-threaded runtime. The only exception I can > think of is some of the backends like CGI and FastCGI, but those are > increasingly not used at all. My guess is you'll be safe. Let me elaborate a bit: There are architectures where the threaded runtime is not available, such as sparc. We have the choice of building without -threaded there, or not at all, and would like to hear your opinion about this choice. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part