Re: ghc now almost ready for migration

["Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>]

On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 18:24:16 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 07/06/2011 18:14, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > BTW, is it a problem to have the dummy packages from haskell-dummy,
> > which are arch all, depend on their libghc-*-dev counterpart even 
> > though
> > it might not exist on all arches? Or is britney satisfied if the
> > dependencies of an arch:all packages are satisfiable on at least one
> > architecture?
>
> iirc, they are only checked on i386, but I could be wrong here… Adam? 
> :)

Yep.  arch:all packages _must_ be installable on i386 (which is fun for 
e.g. partman-[uz]fs), but britney doesn't care if they're broken 
elsewhere.

Regards,

Adam