Joachim Breitner wrote: > my thought is that if we do backports, then we should backport the > complete set of haskell packages, including ghc, so the ghc6→ghc > migration should not be a problem; we just do it in backports as well. > > So it is basically a problem of rebuilding everything, i.e. of > manpower. > > Maybe, first someone should script something to rebuild ghc_7-* and > haskell-* on a Debian stable machine and provide an unofficial backport. > If that works out well and user demand is present, then we can consider > an official backport. A backport would make my backport of git-annex easier to create, more featureful (hs3 is not in stable), and more robust (monad-control is not in stable). -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature