[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: collab-maint vs. DHG


Am Mittwoch, den 05.10.2011, 22:05 +0900 schrieb Kiwamu Okabe:
> Ah... sorry...
> I dropped this information.
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Joachim Breitner <nomeata@debian.org> wrote:
> > I see that you started maintaing a few haskell packages in git repos on
> > collab-maint. Is there a good reason for not using the Debian Haskell
> > Group infrastructure described under
> > http://wiki.debian.org/Haskell/CollabMaint/DarcsBasic ? This has the
> > benefit of uniform treatment and monitoring by
> > http://pkg-haskell.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/pet.cgi
> My collab-mainted packages should relocate to darcs repo?

I’d strongly recommend, it would also make sponsoring easier for us.

I have added you to the pkg-haskell group on alioth. Please make sure
you are subscribed to
 * debian-haskell
 * pkg-haskell-maintainers
 * pkg-haskell-commits
and have at least skimmed through the information on
http://wiki.debian.org/Haskell, especially Processes and DarcsBasic.


Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: