Re: Bug#640088: FTBFS on arches without ghci: Cant do annotations without GHCi

To: debian-haskell@lists.debian.org
Cc: 640088@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#640088: FTBFS on arches without ghci: Cant do annotations without GHCi
From: Joachim Breitner <nomeata@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 11:17:18 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 1314955038.2438.13.camel@kirk>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1314954520.2438.12.camel@kirk>
References: <20110902074958.12103.91682.reportbug@kirk> <[🔎] 20110902181926.c9c7c0b341d1a289a325ecca@mega-nerd.com> <[🔎] 1314954520.2438.12.camel@kirk>

Hi,

Am Freitag, den 02.09.2011, 11:08 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> Maybe ghci on armel is a low-hanging fruit, specially if this arch
> selection was made before http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/631
> was fixed (see last comment there). 

but see http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Building/Porting#GHCi

Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bug#640088: FTBFS on arches without ghci: Cant do annotations without GHCi
  - From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+hs@mega-nerd.com>

References:
- Bug#640088: FTBFS on arches without ghci: Cant do annotations without GHCi
  - From: Erik de Castro Lopo <erikd@mega-nerd.com>
- Re: Bug#640088: FTBFS on arches without ghci: Cant do annotations without GHCi
  - From: Joachim Breitner <nomeata@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#640088: FTBFS on arches without ghci: Cant do annotations without GHCi
Next by Date: Re: Bug#640088: FTBFS on arches without ghci: Cant do annotations without GHCi
Previous by thread: Re: Bug#640088: FTBFS on arches without ghci: Cant do annotations without GHCi
Next by thread: Re: Bug#640088: FTBFS on arches without ghci: Cant do annotations without GHCi
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread