[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: haskell-primitive & haskell-vector



On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 20:14 +0100, Iulian Udrea wrote:
> Dan Doel has just uploaded vector-algorithms 0.5.3 with the following
> dependencies: primitive (>= 0.3 & < 0.5), vector (>= 0.6 & < 0.10). I'm
> updating the remaining packages now.

What is the best practice for upgrading packages that are dependencies
of other packages? In this case, if we upload vector, then we have to
upload the newest version of primitive (0.4.0.1) and then either upgrade
(if there are new upstream releases) the rest of the packages that have
as dependencies primitive or vector or binNMU them.

Should we wait for a transition to happen and then upgrade them or go
with scheduling binNMUs (for packages that don't have newer upstream
releases) so that we won't end up with broken packages in the archive.

I'd appreciate it if someone could enlighten me a tad about this.

Cheers,
--
Iulian Udrea
iulian@linux.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: