[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Haskell-cafe] ANN: Leksah 0.10.0



Hi Hamish,

sorry for the late reply, I was traveling. I hope to get around to
update leksah these days.

Am Samstag, den 23.04.2011, 22:39 +1200 schrieb Hamish Mackenzie:
> On 23 Apr 2011, at 21:48, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Dependancy on haddock-leksah only applies if you are using ghc-6.10.
> If you are only supporting ghc 6.12 and above you can ignore it.
> 
> This is what is in the leksah-server.cabal file...
>    if (impl(ghc >= 6.12))
>       build-depends: haddock >= 2.7.2 && <2.10
>    else
>       build-depends: haddock-leksah == 2.5.0

sorry for not checking this.

> process-leksah is still needed.  The feature request is here...
>  http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/3994
> Favonia has recently made some suggestions and raised some concerns
> and I imagine it may take a little while to resolve those.
> 
> Once it is in we will need to update some of the imports as
> process-leksah module names are different to avoid conflicts.

It seems the patch has been accepted
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/3994#comment:19
So with ghc-7.0.4 process-leksah will not be required, right?

Until then, I am “inlining” the modules, e.g. copying them into the
leksah src directory and using them from there.

> > Also, is there a chance that the features of binary-shared will be
> > merged into binary eventually?
> 
> We would like to see it included and we will prepare a patch and submit
> it to trac/ghc for consideration.

Great. Keep us up-to-date if there is a change.

Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: