Hi Hamish, sorry for the late reply, I was traveling. I hope to get around to update leksah these days. Am Samstag, den 23.04.2011, 22:39 +1200 schrieb Hamish Mackenzie: > On 23 Apr 2011, at 21:48, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Dependancy on haddock-leksah only applies if you are using ghc-6.10. > If you are only supporting ghc 6.12 and above you can ignore it. > > This is what is in the leksah-server.cabal file... > if (impl(ghc >= 6.12)) > build-depends: haddock >= 2.7.2 && <2.10 > else > build-depends: haddock-leksah == 2.5.0 sorry for not checking this. > process-leksah is still needed. The feature request is here... > http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/3994 > Favonia has recently made some suggestions and raised some concerns > and I imagine it may take a little while to resolve those. > > Once it is in we will need to update some of the imports as > process-leksah module names are different to avoid conflicts. It seems the patch has been accepted http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/3994#comment:19 So with ghc-7.0.4 process-leksah will not be required, right? Until then, I am “inlining” the modules, e.g. copying them into the leksah src directory and using them from there. > > Also, is there a chance that the features of binary-shared will be > > merged into binary eventually? > > We would like to see it included and we will prepare a patch and submit > it to trac/ghc for consideration. Great. Keep us up-to-date if there is a change. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part