Hi Julien, Am Donnerstag, den 31.03.2011, 16:06 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 23:57:19 +0530, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > the transitions monitors on http://release.debian.org/transitions/ look > > useful, and I guess it makes more sense to use an existing instance > > instead of setting up the software ourself on alioth. Would that be > > possible? > > > > For the ghc transition, these settings should do, if I guess the syntax > > correctly: > > > > Affected: .build-depends ~ /ghc6?/ > > Good: .depends ~ /libghc-base-dev.*/ > > Bad: .depends ~ /libghc6-base-dev.*/ > > > Added at http://release.debian.org/transitions/ghc7.html > Let me know if that needs changes. thanks, very nice. @DHG: That’s a nice TODO list, isn’t it... I’m surprised by the dependency level calculation – haskell-transformers should be on one level with -deepseq. But maybe that calculation is confused as the binary package names are changing during the transition. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part