Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 14.07.2010, 15:41 -0700 schrieb Don Stewart: > Release candidate specification for the 2010.2.0.0 release of the > Haskell Platform is now available, the first encorporating GHC 6.12.3: > > http://code.haskell.org/haskell-platform/haskell-platform.cabal > > RC for the Unix installer is here: > > http://www.galois.com/~dons/tmp/hp/haskell-platform-2010.2.0.0.tar.gz > > Time to get the Mac and Windows installers ready, and to prep the distro packages!! > > Release due next Thursday. this leads us to the question: What do we want in squeeze? Are we happy with the current situation? Or should we try to get 6.12.3 and 2010.2. ready? As I can see it currently, the state of haskell in testing is quite well. So if we’d upload ghc6-6.12.3 to unstable now and do _not_ make it in testing in time, there is not much of a loss. The only possible problem is if we do not make it to testing in time _and_ it turns out that we have to fix bugs in testing; then we would have to use testing-proposed-updates to fix those. I think I’m in favor of uploading ghc6-6.12.3 and updated libraries to unstable. I’m especially interested in koals opinion, as he is the ghc6 maintainer. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part