Hi Erik. Excerpts from Erik de Castro Lopo's message of Seg Mai 10 08:03:42 -0300 2010: > Joachim Breitner wrote: (...) > > Am Montag, den 10.05.2010, 05:21 +0000 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo: > > > > > diff -rN -u old-haskell-debian/haskell-debian-utils.install new-haskell-debian/haskell-debian-utils.install > > > --- old-haskell-debian/haskell-debian-utils.install 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000 > > > +++ new-haskell-debian/haskell-debian-utils.install 2010-05-10 05:21:39.577505068 +0000 > > > @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ > > > +dist-ghc6/build/apt-get-build-depends/apt-get-build-depends usr/bin/ > > > +dist-ghc6/build/cabal-debian/cabal-debian usr/bin/ > > > +dist-ghc6/build/debian-report/debian-report usr/bin/ > > > +dist-ghc6/build/fakechanges/fakechanges usr/bin/ > > > +debian/*.1 usr/share/man/man1/ > > > > not sure if it makes a difference, but you can use > > debian/haskell-debian-utils.manpages > > to install manpages (see dh_installmanpage). > > I was aware of that, but the thought haskell-debian-utils.install > solution would work for both the binaries and the man pages. Yes, but from the documentation point of view, it's better to use .manpages to install manpages. If you simply look at the files in debian/ and see a .manpages file, you'll know that the package installs a manpage. This is not the case when you only see a .install file. Greetings. (...) -- marcot http://wiki.debian.org/MarcoSilva
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature