Re: Bug#575275: nmu: haskell-hstringtemplate_0.6.2-2
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 06:00:22PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Montag, den 19.04.2010, 17:08 +0200 schrieb Giovanni Mascellani:
> > Iain Lane ha scritto:
> > > Looks like the binNMU was built but not uploaded to the archive. I
> > > pinged the buildd admin about it.
> >
> > Checking the log I found that the build used the updated version of
> > libgh6-text-dev and libgh6-text-prof, but the old one for
> > libghc6-text-doc. Don't know why.
> >
> > Probably the NMU should be reissued. Do you have any advices on why the
> > libghc6-text-* versions were out-of-sync?
>
> no idea, but this is best discussed with debian-wb-team, thus CCing
> them.
>
> The relevant build log is
> https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=haskell-hstringtemplate&arch=mipsel&ver=0.6.2-2%2Bb1&stamp=1269505054&file=log&as=raw
>
> Under what conditions can a package be built against newer arch any
> packages then arch all packages from the same source? I always thought
> it to be safe to assume that when an arch dependent binary package is
> available, then corresponding arch indep packages will be up to date.
My guess would be that haskell-text with it's arch all package was
uploaded over 24 hours before mipsel uploaded it and tried to build
haskell-hstringtemplate. The arch all package would then be removed
from the buildd queue on ftp-master. The Packages file for mipsel
would also not include it, because they now get generated to
include only the arch all package with the same version as the
arch any package. So the buildd can't see the new arch all
package until the next dinstall.
Kurt
Reply to: