Hi zack, Am Sonntag, den 31.01.2010, 10:30 -0200 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva: > Em Dom, 2010-01-31 às 11:43 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli escreveu: > (...) > > It looks like we have a problem then. At the bottom of this mail you can > > find the output of a (dry-run-mode) attempt of removing haskell-utils > > from the archive. There are 24 packages in unstable which still depend > > on haskell-utils, so it can't be removed naively. > > >From what I could see, all these packages, excluding hmake, only depends > on haskell-utils in hurd-i386, ia64 and m68k, which are platforms where > ghc6 was not upgraded to the current version. > > What are your (as in debian-haskell) plans about this? I see only two > > possibilities: or you envisage migrating all such packages to > > haskell-devscripts (modulo some transitive removals of some of them) > > We've done this already for all listed packages but hmake. As no one > replied till now about the use of hmake, I think it should be removed > too. Igloo gave his permission to remove haskell-utils. Do you want me to create a bug against ftp.debian.org, or are there other issues besides hmake? I’m at this very moment looking into upgrading hmake’s packaging. Either I’ll succeed or request removal of hmake. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil