[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GPG signature or SHA1 sum for ghc 7.0.1?



Hi,

Am Montag, den 29.11.2010, 10:57 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> Am Donnerstag, den 25.11.2010, 20:54 +0200 schrieb Kari Pahula:
> > GHC's source is huge.  Even the diff to the last release is huge.
> > Larger than what a single person can browse in any reasonable time, or
> > at least what I can.  As the maintainer of the GHC package in Debian,
> > I'd feel to be in remiss if I didn't do something to verify that what
> > I downloaded from haskell.org is indeed what you intended to release.
> > 
> > Could you please sign the release with GPG or at least provide a SHA1
> > sum or something of the released source?  I'd feel more confident
> > about focusing on the functional aspects of the compiler (no pun
> > intended) and its build system that way.
> 
> according to
> http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/2010-November/thread.html your message did not make it through to their list. Perhaps you have to  subscribe?

indeed, I got a bounce saying that I’m not allowed to post. I guess you
have to subscribe and re-send the mail (or send it to haskell-cafe :-))

Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: