[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Policy rewrite



Hi,

I started to write down what I think should be in a revised Haskell
policy. The old one was outdated in that it mentioned multiple compilers
and was written before the advent of triggers and ABI-based hashes.

I wrote a chapter about the binary package. You can read it here
http://darcs.debian.org/pkg-haskell/policy/haskell-policy.html/
and the source is, well, there :-)

Is it useful so far? Do we need a written-down policy for source
packages, or is the template directory enough documentation for that?

Feel free to clarify, extend, error-correct or rewrite the policy :-)

Greetings from BelHac,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: