Hi Joachim. Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of Qui Set 09 10:58:52 -0300 2010: (...) > Am Donnerstag, den 09.09.2010, 10:45 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e > Silva: (...) > > Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of Qui Set 09 10:30:32 -0300 2010: > > (...) > > > Implement such changes in experimental, or wait for after the release (or at > > > least until it is unlikely that we are changing squeeze through unstable) and > > > then do the stuff in unstable? > > > > Well, sounds like the same to me from the release perspective. Am I missing > > something? > > It the question: Bother with experimental (and thus two versions to care > about, wondering how we best handle that with the darcs repos)? Or wait > (and fix RC bugs in the meanwhile :-)). > > I’m not too fond of using experimental and would not mind waiting, but I > don’t want to hold anyone back. My only problem in waiting is forgetting about it latter, so a ToDo list would be useful enough, and we wouldn't have the trouble of setting up a new PET. As we already have a ToDo list[0], there's no problem at all. We should wait for squeeze. 0: http://wiki.debian.org/Haskell Greetings. (...) -- marcot http://marcot.eti.br/ [Flattr=54498]
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature